What must be stated on the back of the oral order when a follow-up RX is not received?

The correct choice emphasizes the importance of documenting the pharmacist’s involvement in the oral order process. When a follow-up prescription is not received, it is essential to record the date and the name of the pharmacist who took the order. This documentation serves as a legal safeguard and provides accountability, ensuring that there is a record of who handled the order and when it was processed.

The legal standards often require that pharmacists maintain accurate and detailed records for all prescriptions, including oral orders, to demonstrate compliance with pharmacy laws and regulations. By including the date and name of the pharmacist, the pharmacy establishes a chain of responsibility, which is crucial in the event of any inquiries or audits regarding the prescription.

In contrast, the other choices do not encompass the critical elements needed for proper documentation. The follow-up RX parameters, for instance, would involve additional details that may not be strictly necessary if the order itself has not been confirmed. Similarly, documenting just the date and patient name lacks the key accountability aspect provided by including the pharmacist's name, while confirming RX cancellation would apply only if the prescription was officially canceled, which is not relevant in this scenario where a follow-up has not been received.